WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019

WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019

Marsoni

M251S

$17.73

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019Kawasaki 550 JS 1982 1989 Piston Ring OEM #: 13003 3019 . 25mm OVER SIZE ONLY 75. 25mm BOX includes: 1 Ring (single ring piston) (If you need rings for two piston you must purchase QTY 2 this ad is for ONE single ring for ONE piston) Make Model CC HP Year Kawasaki JS 550 1982 Kawasaki JS 550 1983 Kawasaki JS 550 1984 Kawasaki JS 550 1985 Kawasaki JS 550 1986 Kawasaki JS 550 1987 Kawasaki JS 550 1988 Kawasaki JS 550 1989 For more information on our

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM Kawasaki 550 JS 1982-1989 Piston Ring 010-912-04 - .25mm SIZE OE 13003-3019 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

It’s def functional. It looks nice and is not an eye sore. Def will be easy to maintain for cleaning of dust. HOWEVER, four stars simply cause it is a bit top heavy. I will have to find a solution to weight it down so it’s not so top heavy. Possibly in the future they might design a simple one like this with a simple one pound weight across the bottom. Outside of that tiny little issue…a pretty solid simple compact remote holder that functions. Need I say it is Not an eye sore sitting on th coffee table. That was also a winner n my book.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2026